Thank you for your open and honest answer, and I know how hard that can be, to do. You have my book, so you know that in a way, the pivotal point for me was almost as bad. I thought I had read enough, and knew enough, and was wrong.
What I didn't know, was the level of self-serving ego, conflicts of interests, were outside the bounds of t…
Thank you for your open and honest answer, and I know how hard that can be, to do. You have my book, so you know that in a way, the pivotal point for me was almost as bad. I thought I had read enough, and knew enough, and was wrong.
What I didn't know, was the level of self-serving ego, conflicts of interests, were outside the bounds of the written information. That the moral ethics of the system was such that even in 1981, they would put inconvenient file records through the shredder to avoid accountability. That my GP never read his obstetric textbook which he loaned me..., and when challenged on it, said they all just listened to teachers who probably never read their textbooks either. I think (but can't remember) if that was detailed in either "Just a little Prick" or the sequel "From One Prick to Another". I remember asking him "How do you feel now that you know that your textbook says something completely different to what you consider normal practice?"
He didn't answer and it was probably an unfair question as he had only just realised it, when I posed the question.
So that was the shocker to me, that normal practice wasn't even a mirage compared to his textbook, which led to the next question in mind which was, "Is his knowledge of vaccines the same?"
So yes, it always does take a trigger, and after my second child was born, I remember feeling the same guilt for the tough ride my first had needlessly had. But the one good thing that came out of it, was that neither were vaccinated.
Speaking out in the 80's was like being in a very public lion's den. Even then to question was considered dis / mis /fake information - whatever you want to label it. But I didn't care. I was so angry at being deceived in hospital and subsequently, and wanted people to know that the information in Philson library was vastly different to the MoH drivel.
And it's the same today. The whole covid narrative is wrong and the truth is so radioactive, and would so damage public perception, that no-one in the system will ever admit to it.
There is no-one I know, who wants to get into the bench science the way I did, and talk about what is buried in pubmed, that is the truth. Yes finding it is like looking for needles in deliberately huge haystacks but it's worth it.
I don't know where you are. But you know where I am. Any time you feel you want hard data, you are welcome to ask. Obviously there is some hard data you will never find, because the MoH makes sure it never gets onto any searchable data bases.
The corruption is huge and it's now fully impregnated through every layer of society.
This story isn't the tip of the iceberg. It's embedded in the ocean as well:
Thank you for your open and honest answer, and I know how hard that can be, to do. You have my book, so you know that in a way, the pivotal point for me was almost as bad. I thought I had read enough, and knew enough, and was wrong.
What I didn't know, was the level of self-serving ego, conflicts of interests, were outside the bounds of the written information. That the moral ethics of the system was such that even in 1981, they would put inconvenient file records through the shredder to avoid accountability. That my GP never read his obstetric textbook which he loaned me..., and when challenged on it, said they all just listened to teachers who probably never read their textbooks either. I think (but can't remember) if that was detailed in either "Just a little Prick" or the sequel "From One Prick to Another". I remember asking him "How do you feel now that you know that your textbook says something completely different to what you consider normal practice?"
He didn't answer and it was probably an unfair question as he had only just realised it, when I posed the question.
So that was the shocker to me, that normal practice wasn't even a mirage compared to his textbook, which led to the next question in mind which was, "Is his knowledge of vaccines the same?"
So yes, it always does take a trigger, and after my second child was born, I remember feeling the same guilt for the tough ride my first had needlessly had. But the one good thing that came out of it, was that neither were vaccinated.
Speaking out in the 80's was like being in a very public lion's den. Even then to question was considered dis / mis /fake information - whatever you want to label it. But I didn't care. I was so angry at being deceived in hospital and subsequently, and wanted people to know that the information in Philson library was vastly different to the MoH drivel.
And it's the same today. The whole covid narrative is wrong and the truth is so radioactive, and would so damage public perception, that no-one in the system will ever admit to it.
There is no-one I know, who wants to get into the bench science the way I did, and talk about what is buried in pubmed, that is the truth. Yes finding it is like looking for needles in deliberately huge haystacks but it's worth it.
I don't know where you are. But you know where I am. Any time you feel you want hard data, you are welcome to ask. Obviously there is some hard data you will never find, because the MoH makes sure it never gets onto any searchable data bases.
The corruption is huge and it's now fully impregnated through every layer of society.
This story isn't the tip of the iceberg. It's embedded in the ocean as well:
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/exclusive-interview-how-nys-bravest?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=548354&post_id=150152205&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=qjiff&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email